ABSTRACT
Background: Lymphoproliferation is the persistent proliferation of lymphoid cells and it's incidence in inborn errors of immunity varies from 0.7 to 18%. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective analysis of patients referred to the department of Immunology, B. J. Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai between March 2017 to December 2022. Inclusion criteria consisted of 3 months duration of significant lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly or history of lymphoma. The clinical characteristics, laboratory and molecular findings of the included patients were analyzed. Result(s): A total of 66 patients were included. There was a male preponderance with male:female ratio of 25:8. Median age of onset of lymphoproliferation was 4.75 years(Range 1 year to 60 years). Splenomegaly was seen in 75%. Infections included recurrent pneumonia (14/66), recurrent ear infections(5/66), COVID(4/66), one episode of pneumonia(6/66), herpes zoster(3/66), recurrent subcutaneous abscess (3/66), abdominal koch(3/66), chronic sinusitis(2/66), dermatophytosis(2/66), esophageal candidiasis(2/66), recurrent malaria(1/66), recurrent varicella(1/66), cryptococcal meningitis(1/66), gram negative sepsis(1/66), BCG adenitis(1/66), pseudomonas osteomyelitis(1/66), impetigo (1/66), pseudomonas urinary tract infection (1/66), chicken pox(1/66), herpes keratitis(1/66), dengue(1/66), Other manifestations included Evans plus phenotype(10/66), Evans phenotype(8/66), Autoimmune hemolytic anemia(5/66), bronchiectasis(5/66), Type 1 diabetes(3/66), hyper reactive airway disease(2/66), inflammatory bowel disease(4/66), autoimmune thrombocytopenia(2/66), stroke(3/66), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis(2/66), hypertriglyceridemia(2/66), hypothyroidism(2/66), celiac disease(1/66), Type 2 diabetes(1/66), autoimmune encephalitis(1/66), autoimmune hepatitis(2/66), anti-parietal cell antibody(1/66), arthritis(1/66), autoimmune enteropathy(1/66), systemic lupus erythromatosus(1/66), primary biliary cirrhosis requiring liver transplant(1/66), nephrotic syndrome(1/66), lymphoedema(1/66), hypersplenism(1/66), recurrent oral ulcers(1/66), gout(1/66), dermatitis(1/66), ovarian teratoma(1/66), alopecia areata(1/66). Hodgkin's lymphoma(HL) was the most common malignancy(9/66), followed by non Hodgkin lymphoma(NHL)(6/66), transformation from NHL to HL(1/66), Burkitt to T-cell lymphoma(1/66), HL to DLBCL(1/66), HL to anaplastic T-cell lymphoma(1/66). EBV driven lymphoproliferation was seen in biopsy of21/66. Genetic testing showed mutations in LRBA(11/66), PIK3CD(5/66), CTLA4(3/66), TET2(2/66), IL2RA (1/66), IL12RB1(1/66), BACH2(1/66), PRKCD(1/66), TNFSFR13B(1/66), TNFAIP3(1/66), FAS(2/66), FASL(1/66), Caspase8(1/66), CARD11(1/66), RTEL1(1/66), AICD(1/66), PIK3R1(1/66), IKBKB(1/66). Treatment included IVIG, chemotherapy, rituximab, sirolimus, abatacept, HSCT. Conclusion(s): All children with persistent lymphoproliferation, with or without autoimmunity and/or infections should be worked up for an underlying monogenic disorder of immune dysregulation. Lymphomas presenting at abnormal site and/or age, relapse and EBV driven lymphomas require further evaluation. Presence of monogenic cause helps in providing targeted therapy.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with cancer are at a higher risk of getting infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 owing to their immunocompromised state. Providing care to these patients amidst the first wave of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was extremely challenging. Objective(s): This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical profile and disease-related outcomes of pediatric patients with hematological illnesses and cancer. Material(s) and Method(s): This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India during the first wave of the pandemic from March 2020 to December 2020. Children aged up to 18 years, who were treated for a hematological illness or malignancy or underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and tested positive for COVID-19 regardless of symptoms were included in the study. Baseline demographic data related to the age, diagnosis, treatment status, and chemotherapy protocol used were collected. Outcomes including the cure rates, comorbidities, and sequelae were recorded. Result(s): A total of 650 tests for COVID-19 were performed for 181 children;22 patients were found to be COVID-19 positive. The most common diagnosis was acute leukemia (63.6%). None of the patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia. The majority of patients had asymptomatic infection and were managed at home. Among those with a symptomatic infection, the most common symptoms were fever and cough. A total of 3 (13.6%) patients needed oxygen therapy, one developed multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children leading to cardiogenic shock. Three patients required intensive care or respiratory support;all the patients had favorable clinical outcomes. The median time from the onset of COVID-19 to a negative result on the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test was 21.3 days. Cancer treatment was modified in 15 patients (68.2%). Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that children with hemato-oncological illnesses rarely experience severe COVID-19 disease. The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 primarily manifested as disruptions in the logistic planning and administration of essential treatment to these children rather than COVID-19 sequelae.Copyright © 2021 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: IgA vasculitis is more commonly seen in the pediatric population than in adults. Rarely IgA vasculitis is associated with malignancy, most commonly solid tumor malignancies, although there are case reports of association with hematologic malignancies. We report a case of large B-cell lymphoma mimicking IgA vasculitis in a 33-year-old immunosuppressed male with a prior history of IgA vasculitis. Case Description/Methods: A 33-year-old Caucasian male post renal transplant from reflux nephropathy on chronic immunosuppression was hospitalized for postprandial epigastric abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Two years prior, he was admitted for the same symptoms, palpable purpura of the lower extremities and elevated serum IgA. Enteroscopy had shown duodenal and jejunal ulceration with biopsies staining positive for IgA, confirming IgA vasculitis. He had complete resolution with a steroid taper. His current presentation had resulted in multiple hospital admissions, but empiric trial of steroids failed to alleviate symptoms. Vitals were normal and exam was notable for epigastric tenderness. Labs were notable for WBC 19.00 x103/cmm with normal differential, hemoglobin 9.2 gm/dL (prior 11.0 gm/dL), CRP 20.7 mg/L, serum creatinine 2.7 mg/dL (prior 1.5 mg/dL), and urinalysis with proteinuria, sterile pyuria, and hematuria. CTA abdomen/pelvis revealed thickening of the duodenum with shotty mesenteric lymph nodes without ischemia. Enteroscopy revealed an erythematous duodenum and jejunum (figure A). Jejunal biopsy (figure B) revealed CD20 positive cells consistent with DLCBL (figure C). He was seen by oncology and treated with R-CHOP but later unfortunately expired due to COVID-19 complications. Discussion(s): Non small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma are most commonly associated with IgA vasculitis. It may also be seen in both Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in adult patients. If IgA vasculitis occurs after a malignancy is diagnosed, it may indicate that metastasis has occurred. Malignancy associated IgA vasculitis is more likely to have an incomplete response to steroids and requires treatment of the underlying malignancy to achieve remission. Our case illustrates posterior probability error and premature closure cognitive biases. We should consider alternative diagnoses rather than anchor on prior diagnoses even when presentations are similar. Our case also highlights the importance of considering occult malignancy in adults with diagnosis of IgA vasculitis.
ABSTRACT
From March 2020 to May 2022, when SARS-CoV2 pandemic started spreading in Italy, 15 consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) have been treated at the Pediatric Unit of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. Three of 15 patients developed COVID19 while on treatment [1 Burkitt lymphoma (BL), 1 anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 1 lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma (T-LL)] and one patient at diagnosis [gray zone lymphoma (GZL), previously misdiagnosed as Hodgkin lymphoma]. Median age at diagnosis was 12 years;3 were male. Median positivity time of the nasal swab was 58 days (range 9-107 days). All patients remained asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic (flu-like symptoms) while positive. The first positive patient with T-LL, was in the induction phase of the Euro-LB-02 protocol guidelines: he succeeded in completing the whole treatment during the 107 days of swab positivity, experiencing mild toxicities (grade 2 transaminases and grade 3 lipase increase, both reversible) without significant delays. For this reason, we reduced the total dose of the first HD-MTX (protocol M) and administer the subsequent doses in 6 hours infusion instead of 24 with no further toxicities. After this first experience, all the subsequent patients have been treated accordingly, without major deviations from the established protocols. Minor precautions: the patient with refractory GZL received IEP course instead of IGEV as second-line treatment to avoid severe subsequent immunosuppression;the patient with BL omitted the fourth course of Rituximab during the period of swab positivity. Overall, we did not observe outstanding toxicities except for a toxic MTX level with subsequent reversible acute renal failure. Main teaching from these pilot experiences, which may translate into guidelines: 1) SARS-CoV2 infection is not an absolute contraindication to the oncological treatments. This is of main importance for the patients affected by lymphoma whose dose-intensity has a prognostic value. 2)We need to pay caution during HD-MTX treatment;indeed, we observed unexpected similar toxicities in other patients treated with HD-MTX for other solid malignancies. 3) The clearance of SARS-CoV2 might be exceptionally prolonged with persistent positivity of the nasal swabs for a longer time than the matched healthy population due to the immunosuppression characterizing lymphoma patients. For this reason and given the importance of maintaining the dose-intensity, specific treatments aiming at speeding up the clearing process are warmly suggested. (Figure Presented) Figure 1: (: 091) ITHACA study design and blood sampling time points. (OHT = Orthotopic Heart Transplant).Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital (HAH) in Havana is the only center performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients in Cuba. Because transplants from unrelated donors are not possible due to political restrictions and economic embargo, in 2016 HAH and University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) started a collaboration to support the training of a physician, annual educational programs and exchange of guidelines and protocols to perform haploidentical transplants. The first haploidentical transplant was performed at HAH in 2016. Because of limited resources, disease risk stratification is based on morphologic assessment, as cytogenetic is tested on an irregular basis. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were infused based on total nucleated cell count (TNC) due to lack of reagents for flow cytometry. Posttransplant chimerism and CMV monitoring cannot be performed. Transplant activity was stopped in 2020 due to high expenses allocated for COVID19 pandemic in Cuba. From 2016 to 2020, 16 haploidentical HSCT in 15 patients (9 males/ 6 females) were completed at HAH. The median age of patients was 34 years (range:21-54). Diagnoses included: acute leukemia, n=12, myelodysplastic syndrome, n=1, Hodgkin disease, n=1, and severe aplastic anemia, n=1. At the time of transplant, 11 patients were in morphologic remission and 5 had active disease. Conditioning regimens utilized were myeloablative (Flu/Bu) in 10 cases and at reduced intensity (Flu/Cy/ TBI200 +/- ATG) in 6 cases, and GVHD prophylaxis was standard PTCy on D3 and 4, CsA and mycophenolate. The donors were mother (n=10), father (n=1), child (1), or sibling (n=3) and the median age was 48 years (range: 26-68). All patients received fresh stem cells from PBSC(n=13) or bone marrow (n=3). Median cell dose infused was 5.5x108 TNC/kg (range: 2.2-8). All patients but 1 engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 days (range:12-28) and 16 days (range:11-30), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-3 occurred in 50% of patients and chronic GVHD in 2 out of 8 that were evaluable. Day 100 and 2-year overall survival rates were 73% and 40%, respectively. With a medium follow-up of 18.8 months (range: 0.3-64), 5 of 15 patients (30%) are alive and complete remission. Causes of death in the remaining 10 patients included relapse of original disease, n= 4;bacterial infection, n=2;brain hemorrhage, n=1;VOD, n=1;graft failure, n=1;and multi-organ failure, n=1. Despite significant difficulties, HAH implemented a haploidentical transplant program for adult patients in Cuba. Among future steps, improving access to molecular testing and using younger donors will be pursued to improve on the results. The partnership between HAH and UIC has been instrumental in building clinical and research capacity and continues to support HAH in its mission to provide care to patients in Cuba.(Figure Presented)Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) accounts for 30% of all lymphomas. The standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced HL remains chemotherapy regimens containing bleomycin, a drug associated with lung toxicity. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibodydrug conjugate, combined with AVD (Adriamycin, Vinblastin and Dacarbazin) has been approved as a treatment for patients with untreated CD301 stage IV HL. No data (outside of clinical trials) were found on this use of BV-AVD in routine clinical practice. In this report, we describe 4 cases of HL treated with BV-AVD as first-line therapy. Material(s) and Method(s): Cases reported by the hematology department. Data were collected from CHIMIO software and medical records from 6/29/2021 to 3/21/2022. Results and discussion: Four patients (3 men, 1 woman, mean age 59 years [52-67], performance status 1-2) with advancedHL (2 stage III, 2 stage IV, all CD30+) were treated with BV-AVD as first-line treatment. Two patients had lung disease (1 HIV with a history of pneumocystis, tuberculosis and 1 emphysema) and 2 patients had active smoking, a major risk factor for lung disease. Three complete responses and one partial response were achieved, with no relapse to date. Treatment was well tolerated, with no pulmonary complications, no BV-induced neurotoxicity greater than grade 1, and no neutropenia (G-CSF prophylaxis). Although the drug is not reimbursed in this therapeutic indication in our country, our data suggest that BV-AVD is an attractive first-line treatment option in clinical practice for patients with advanced HL and risk factors for pulmonary complications, even in patients older than 60 years. Conclusion(s): Based on these results and in the context of the COVID pandemic, we redefined our therapeutic strategy for the front-line treatment of advanced HL with the BV-AVD indication in patients with pulmonary frailty.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Our institution cares for a largely underserved urban population, treating about 120 children annually with radiation therapy;roughly 10% are referred for proton therapy elsewhere. COVID-19 led to some decreases in medical care due to uncertainties regarding the state of public health. The purpose of this study is to evaluate existing socioeconomic disparities using the University of Wisconsin Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and whether the pandemic impacted this referral pattern. Method(s): Over the last twenty years, approximately 2,275 children have presented to our institution for radiation treatment. A retrospective chart review was conducted and a patient database of demographic and clinical information was created. We used demographic data to obtain the ADI, and compared relative disparity rankings between proton therapy recipients and a random sample of patients from the 25 most common zip codes (representative of over 20% of the total cohort). We compared the number of patients treated only at the closest proton facility before and after the onset of the pandemic. Result(s): The demographic make-up of our patient population is approximately 53.7% Latino, 22.6% White, 9.5% African American, 9.2% Asian, and 5% Other. Of these patients, about 500 had diagnoses typically referred for proton therapy (such as brain tumors, neuroblastoma, sarcomas, and Hodgkin lymphoma). At baseline, we found a statistically significant difference in the median state ADI decile of 3 and 7 for protons and photons, respectively, reflecting lower socioeconomic disadvantage in the proton group. There was a difference in the median household income (based on zip code) of $102,028 and $70,479 between the proton and photon groups (p < 0.0001). There was also a difference in median household income of $57,871 and $76,808 between Latino and Non-Latino patients (p < 0.0001). Demographic data for the proton therapy cohort showed that 46.2% of these patients were White, 15.4% were Latino, 15.4% were African American, 7.7% were Asian, and 15.4% were Other. At the closest proton facility, between 2014-2019, 16 of our patients received radiation therapy. Since the beginning of pandemic associated restrictions in March 2020, 19 patients have received proton therapy at this center. Conclusion(s): Disparities preventing patients from receiving proton therapy have been described. Our work adds granular census block data and uses the ADI which takes into account median family income, unemployment rate, households without access to a vehicle, English language proficiency and more. Those with lower ADI risk rankings were overrepresented in the proton therapy group. Despite the pandemic and added referral challenges, the number of patients able to receive proton therapy did not decrease which we hypothesize may be due to many factors, including the unanticipated flexibility of remote work amongst those with lower ADI rankings. Latinos were least likely to have proton therapy, and further research is needed to ameliorate the disparities and barriers to care which they face.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Lung Nodule Biopsy: Yield and Accuracy SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/16/2022 10:30 am - 11:30 am PURPOSE: A variety of endpoints have been used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of navigational bronchoscopy for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), including diagnostic yield (rate of biopsies with a specific diagnosis that facilitates clinical decisions) and diagnostic accuracy (yield plus a follow-up to assess for false negative/positive initial results). There is also significant variation in what non-malignant findings are considered diagnostic, especially regarding nonspecific inflammatory changes. We hypothesized a diagnostic yield definition excluding nonspecific findings as diagnostic would lead to few false negative PPL biopsies. METHOD(S): Our center maintains a prospective cohort of consecutive PPLs targeted via navigational bronchoscopy. Diagnostic yield was defined as specific findings readily explaining the presence of a PPL (malignancy, organizing pneumonia, granulomatous inflammation, frank purulence, other specific finding) permitting management without immediate additional diagnostic intervention. "Other specific finding" required pulmonologist and lung pathologist agreement. All other findings were considered non-diagnostic. RESULT(S): A total of 450 PPLs biopsied 2017-2019 with complete two-year follow-up were included in the analysis. Ultimately, 274 of 450 (60.9%) PPLs were determined to be malignant. Diagnostic biopsies were obtained in 331 cases (73.6%). There was a single false-positive among 228 malignant biopsies (0.4%, carcinoid tumor on cytopathology, alveolar adenoma on resection surgical pathology). Among 223 PPLs without malignant diagnosis at initial bronchoscopy, 48 were later determined to be malignant. Most (n=39) exhibited nonspecific abnormalities on initial pathology. Two of 104 specific benign biopsies were false negative (1.9%). Both demonstrated organizing pneumonia on initial pathology but re-biopsy months after index bronchoscopy revealed Hodgkin's lymphoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of specific benign findings for an ultimately benign nodule were 58% (95% CI, 51-66%), 95% (86-99%), and 90% (70-97%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of nonspecific benign findings for an ultimately benign PPL diagnosis were 32% (95% CI, 25-39%), 19% (9-33%), and 20% (16-24%). CONCLUSION(S): A definition of diagnostic yield excluding nonspecific benign findings had low false positive/negative rates. If bronchoscopy is not diagnostic of malignancy, a specific benign finding was highly predictive of an ultimately benign PPL, while nonspecific findings poorly predicted benignity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This definition of diagnostic yield could be used as the primary outcome in future studies, permitting distribution of reliable diagnostic results without requiring years of follow-up. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Joyce Johnson No relevant relationships by Robert Lentz No relevant relationships by Kaele Leonard No relevant relationships by See-Wei Low PI ofan investigator-initiated study relationship with Medtronic Please note: >$100000 by Fabien Maldonado, value=Grant/Research Support PI on investigator-initiated relationship with Erbe Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Fabien Maldonado, value=Grant/Research Support Consulting relationship with Medtronic Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Fabien Maldonado, value=Honoraria co-I industry-sponsored trial relationship with Lung Therapeutics Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Fabien Maldonado, value=Grant/Research Support Board of director member relationship with AABIP Please note: $1-$1000 by Fabien Maldonado, value=Travel Consultant relationship with Medtronic/Covidien Please note: $1001 - $5000 by Otis Rickman, value=Consulting fee No relevant relationships by Briana Swanner Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians
ABSTRACT
Objective: Adulthood retroclival hematomas (RCHs) are a rare condition characterized by intracranial bleeding along the posterior aspect of the clivus. There are few reports in the literature that describe these hematomas. There is no agreement on how to treat these hematomas. Methods: An extensive literature review was performed, and the data was classified and analyzed on this topic from January 2000 to January 2022. A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA and CARE Guidelines. Results were analyzed and potential clinical links were extracted. Results: Twenty-seven RCHs in adulthood were reported in twenty high-quality articles. 12/27 RCHs in adults were spontaneous. Epidural retroclival hematomas were present in 12/27 patients, while subdural hematomas were present in 13/27 patients. 15 of 22 adult RCHs observed were small in size. Epidural hematomas are typically associated with trauma (9/15 traumatic RCHs), whereas subdural hematomas are more frequently associated with spontaneous bleeding (8/12 spontaneous RCHs). There was one case of hydrocephalus, six cases of cranial nerve palsies (five of which were traumatic), and thirteen cases of intraspinal extension of the hematoma. Seven individuals exhibited craniovertebral instability (100 percent traumatic). Most hematomas were conservatively treated (77.8 percent). 21 hematomas had favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusions: There is a lack of agreement on management protocols for RCHs in adulthood. These hematomas occur almost equally in both the extradural and the subdural spaces, and they are typically small in size. When an RCH occurs in the epidural space, it is more likely to result in cranial nerve palsies and craniospinal instability. Associated craniovertebral anomalies must be thoroughly analyzed in trauma patients. Only patients with a significant mass effect on the brainstem are candidates for surgical hematoma evacuation. It is imperative that future studies on this rare entity adhere to strict publication guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Background: Special epidemiological measures aimed at suppressing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak were introduced in Croatia in March 2020, thus reducing regular work capacity in hematological outpatient and inpatient care. In our hospital, this included relocating the entire Hematology Department to a remote location, reduction of hospital beds in the Hematology Inpatient Unit by approximately 60%, Day Clinic operating at a reduced capacity, and a complete suspension of Hematology Polyclinic during first lockdown. Aims: Herein we report our observation of unusually high incidence of newly diagnosed malignant hematological diseases following first lockdown ease in May/June 2020. Methods: We collected data of patients hospitalized in Hematology Department for 4 periods: May 1 - June 15, 2020 for the test arm, and the same calendar period during previous 3 years (May 1 - June 15 of each of the calendar years 2017, 2018 and 2019), for the control arm. The rationale for such design was that a phenomenon of re-establishing regular work capacity, following temporary restriction, was only observed in the test arm. The study included patients of both sexes older than 18 who were diagnosed with either: Hodgkin lymphoma (C81.0 -C81.9 according to the 10th ICD Revision), different types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (subsections C82.0 - C83.9 and C85.1-C85), as well as multiple myeloma and malignant plasma cell neoplasms (C90.0 - C90.3). Excluded from our study were diagnoses of T/NK cell lymphoma (C84.0- C84.9;C86.0 - C86.6), malignant immunoproliferative diseases (C88.0 - C88.9), leukemias and other specified malignant neoplasms of lymphatic, hematopoietic and related tissues (C91.0 - C96.9) as well as polycythemia vera and non-malignant hematological diseases (D45 and D50 - D89 in ICD-10). Results: In years 2017-2019, similar numbers of patients were diagnosed with a hematological malignancy in our Department (n=4 for 2017, n=8 for 2018, n=4 for 2019) whereas in 2020, a total of 28 patients were diagnosed during the same calendar period (Hodgkin lymphoma: n=5, NHL n=12, multiple myeloma n=7, CLL/SLL n=4). Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase (p ≤0.05) of newly diagnosed hematological malignancies in May and first half of June 2020, when compared to the same calendar periods during previous three years. Further statistical analysis has not established significant differences in outcome (difference in EFS statistically insignificant, p=0.86), as we had expected in the short follow-up period. (Table Presented) Summary/Conclusion: Facilitating treatment of patients affected by the novel coronavirus represented a welcome change in healthcare system in early 2020, in our country and abroad. At the same time, however, the reduction of tertiary health care capacity aimed at population with hematological diseases presented serious risks for successful diagnosis and treatment outcome, a subject that gained wide attention in literature. It has been reported that, also due to psychological reasons, a fraction of patients delayed seeking medical attention after noticing symptoms. In our study we aimed at analyzing the effects of lockdown ease on the number of newly diagnosed hematological malignancies. We were able to demonstrate the effect of pandemic-related measures on detecting new disease cases. It remains to be clarified if a sudden surge in new diagnoses was due to delayed first physician's appointments/hospitalizations, as is suggested by available literature. The results of our study suggest that longer follow-up period will be required in order to clarify the effects of possible late diagnoses on the treatment outcome.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with lymphopproliferative diseases (LPD) and covid-19 have poor outcome as consequence of inadequate humoral and cellular immunity due to the hematological disease itself but also due to the administered chemotherapy which further increases the risk of complications and mortality. Aims: The aim of this study is to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, the presence of comorbidities, laboratory parameters, disease status, as well as outcome of the patients with COVID-19 and lymphoproliferative disease and compare them with characteristics of covid-19 infection in patients from general population (GP). Methods: This is a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in the following 3 University centers in period from 15 March 2020 to 31 October 2021. The study included hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection: 161 patients with LPD and 162 patients from the GP. Statistical analysis included demographic statistics, the χ2 test, the Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier method for analysis of survival and multivariate logistic regression model for analysis of risk factors for mortality. Results: In the LPD group, there were 54 patients (33.54%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 72 patients (44.72%) with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL/HL) and 35 patients (21.74%) with multiple myeloma (MM). Ninety-six (59,63%) patients were on active treatment and 14(8.7%) patients were newly diagnosed. The LPD and GP group differed significantly in relation to age (66 vs. 54 years), gender (male: 60.2% vs. 75.3%), presence of comorbidities (109, 67.7% vs. 81, 50%) patients, covid score (mild 22.5% vs. 1.9%, moderate 80, 50.3% vs. 121, 74.7%), and severe/critical 44(27.1%) vs. 38(23.4%) patients. Group of patients with LPD had also significantly lower level of hemoglobin, lowest value of lymphocytes, platelets, higher level of CRP, ferritin, Ddimer (on admission and maximal values) and LDH with respect to group of patients from GP. Mortality rate was higher in LPD group of patients than in GP group (45, 28% vs. 26, 16%) patients. Among the LPD group, the highest mortality rate was observed in patients with MM (16, 45.71%) patients, followed by CLL (15, 27.9%) patients and NHL/HL group (14, 19.4%) patients. Independent factors related to survival are high value of D dimer, anemia (hemoglobin <100g/l) and moderate/critical COVID score in LPD group, while maximal value of CRP, anemia, leucocytosis and age (>60 years) in GP group. Summary/Conclusion: Our study showed significant difference in the characteristics and outcome in covid-19 between patients with LPD and patients from GP. Patients with LPD are older, they have significantly higher inflammatory parameters and more frequent presence of comorbidities compared to patients from GP. Independent factors related to survival in the LPD group are high values of D dimer, moderate/critical COVID score and anemia, while maximal values of CRP, anemia and older age are identified in the GP group.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) infected with SARS-CoV-2 hae a higher risk of deeloping seere coronairus disease (COVID-19) with consequent death, due to immune system impairment. Anti-spike Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies (nMoAbs) are indicated for the treatment of paucisymptomatic COVID-19 patients, but eidence of safety and efficacy among HM subjects is still lacking. Aims: To assess the efficacy of different nMoAbs approed by Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) on HM patients affected by paucisymptomatic SARS-COV-2. Methods: Multicenter retrospectie obserational study at ten sites in Italy, which enrolled consecutie patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and treated with nMoAbs from February 2020 to December 2021. Only HM subjects on treatment or in disease remission within 6 months from treatment discontinuation with paucisymptomatic SARSCOV- 2 infection were included. nMoAbs approed by AIFA include Bamlaniimab, Bamlaniimab/Eteseimab, Casiriimab/Imdeimab, Sotroimab, and Regdanimab. The primary endpoint was to assess the time to SARS-CoV- 2 molecular swab negatiization. A comparison to an historical control not receiing nMoAbs was assessed. Secondary endpoints consisted in ealuation of Hospitalization rate due to COVID-19, including intensie care unit (ICU) admission rate due to respiratory failure, and safety assessment. Results: Oerall 51 HM patients (median age 62 years;35% women) were ealuated. Seenteen of them had non- Hodgkin lymphomas, 9 multiple myeloma, 6 chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 6 acute myeloid leukemia, 3 Hodgkin lymphoma, 2 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 2 myeloproliferatie neoplasm, 1 Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and 5 had other HM diagnosis. Thirty-six patients were on actie treatment, whereas 11 had completed their therapies within 6 months from nMoAbs administration, for 4 patients data were missing. In 7 subjects the last treatment was chemotherapy, in 19 immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy, in 9 target therapy, in 4 autologous stem cell transplantation, in 2 allogeneic stem cell transplantation, for 4 patients data were missing. Detailed description of patients' characteristics is reported in table 1. Twenty-six patients were treated with Bamlaniimab/Eteseimab, 17 with Casiriimab/Imdeimab, 3 with Bamlaniimab, and 2 with Sotroimab, for 3 patients data were missing. Median time to SARS-CoV-2 molecular swab negatiization was ealuable in 41 subjects and was 17 days (min 5, IQR 12-26, max 174). This result compared well with the preious finding of 28 days reported in an historical group of HM patients not treated with nMoAbs. We did not find any subpopulation, according to age, diagnosis, period of infection or type of nMoAbs who achieed a major benefit from nMoAbs treatment. The rate of Hospitalization due to COVID-19 progression was 19% (10/51), with an extremely low percentage of patients requiring ICU admission due to seer COVID-19 (2%,1/51). Most frequent side effects included chills (8%), diarrhea (6%), headache (2%), nausea (2%) and omiting (2%). Summary/Conclusion: Among paucisymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positie HM patients on actie treatment or in disease remission within 6 months from treatment discontinuation, the administration of nMoAbs substantially reduced the time to swab negatiization compared to an historical control of HM subjects. This treatment was also able to reduce the rate of Hospitalization and death due to COVID-19 progression in this high risk group. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: In most individuals, protective humoral and cellular immunity develops after two doses of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine. In patients with lymphoma, humoral response is weaker and almost universally abrogated in patients who received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Whether cellular immune response is also abrogated is unknown. Aims: To determine whether patients with lymphoma develop specific T-cell mediated cellular response to BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine. Methods: We included patients with lymphoma above the age of 18 years who received two doses of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine and collected clinical and demographics data. T-cell immune response to the vaccine was analysed in patients' blood samples stimulated by spike antigen and quantified by two methods: (1) Interferon-gamma (IFNg)- release assay (IGRA, EuroImmun, Germany)- IFNg was quantified by ELISA (DuoSet, R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) and response above 50 pg/ml was considered positive. (2) Flow cytometry- Quantification of the T cell activation markers, CD134+ CD25+CD4+ T-cells was performed (Act-T4 CellTM kit, Cytognos, Spain), and any response above 0 was considered positive. Humoral response was measured by SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott©) assay. The positive cut-off was set at 50AU/ml. Blood samples were drawn approximately 4 months after the second vaccination. Results: Sixty-nine lymphoma patients, treated with two vaccine doses, were included in this study. Median age was 66 (range: 30-84) and 39 (57%) were males. Sixty-two patients (90%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) including 18 with DLBCL, 26 with follicular lymphoma and 14 with marginal zone lymphoma. Seven (10%) patients had Hodgkin lymphoma. In this cohort, 70% (n=49) of the patients received anti CD20 MoAb, and 35% of them (n=27) were still on anti CD20 treatment. Thirteen patients received bendamustine-based immunochemotherapy. At the time of assessment (median 4.8 months after the 2nd vaccine) anti-spike antibodies were detected in only 42% (N = 29) of patients. In comparison, there was an increase in specific T cell response by any assay (IGRA and Flow) in 49% of patients (n = 34). The correlation between the IGRA and flow data was 0.7 (pearson correlation, P = 0.01). However, no correlation between humoral (qualitative and quantitative) and T cell response was shown, regardless of the assay applied. Cellular response was not corelated with the time elapsing from last immunochemotherapy. In the anti-CD20 MoAb treated cohort, of which 27 patients were still on active treatment at the time of vaccination, only 2 patients (7%) developed a humoral immune response, while cellular immunity was elicited in 52% (N = 15) patients (ELISA assay). In the Bendamustine treated cohort, with a median time from end of treatment to vaccination of 23 months (1-106 months), humoral but not cellular response correlated positively with the time from treatment completion to vaccination (p=0.04). Summary/Conclusion: The rate of cellular and humoral response to two doses of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine in lymphoma patients was found to be significantly abrogated. In this small cohort, 49% of patients developed a cellular response despite a severely abrogated humoral immunity. These findings suggest that vaccine administration should be considered even early after anti CD20 therapy despite the reduced humoral immunity. These findings should be validated in studies with a higher number of patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: In patients (pts) with hematological malignancies, COVID-19 is considered to be associated with a high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. While anti-COVID-19 vaccination of such pts has become the standard of care, pts undergoing lymphodepleting therapy fail to generate protective serological response due to either the nature of their underlying disease or exposure to therapy. Aims: This study aimed to assess serological response to vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer) as well as COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) pts. Methods: The above vaccine was available in Israel from January 2021 and all pts with hematological malignancies were recommended to undergo vaccination with 2 doses of this vaccine, injected 21 days apart. Six months later a 3rd dose was recommended and in another 3 months a 4th dose was available for pts at risk. Serology tests were performed at least 2 weeks after the 2nd vaccination. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott©) assay was used to measure levels of IgG antibodies (Abs) against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. A result was considered positive if the IgG level was ≥150 AU/ml, which was defined as an adequate serological response. Results: The current non-interventional single-center study evaluated the outcome of 55 HL pts (median age 46 years, 53% females);51% of pts had advanced HL. Study participants received 1-9 lines of therapy (median 1 line). Six pts had COVID-19 prior to vaccination, 49 were vaccinated: 9 with 2 doses, 36 with 3 doses and 4 with 4 doses of BNT162b2. Following initial 2 vaccine doses and after a 3rd dose Ab levels >150 AU/ml were developed in 85% and 89.5% of pts, respectively. At a median of 95 days post-2nd vaccination, Ab levels were 2024 (1-29400) and 4 (0-7539) in 48 patients with no background disease versus 7 pts treated with lymphodepleting drugs or having a background disease, respectively. During the follow-up, 5 vaccinated pts were diagnosed with COVID-19 when the Delta variant was prevalent and 9-during the Omicron wave. Notably, similar Ab levels were observed in those infected with Omicron and in non-infected pts, reflecting the genetic drift of this variant. A further analysis was performed to compare findings in a subgroup of 7 pts who had an additional background disease along with HL, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, s/p kidney transplantation, solid tumor, or those who were heavily pretreated, including therapy with bendamustine, versus the values observed in the rest 48 pts. The median age in the former subgroup was 58 (31-80) years, which was significantly older than in the remaining pts [median 45 (18-78) years] and median Ab levels were 4 (0-7539) AU/ml and 2024 (1-2940) AU/ml, respectively. Notably, after the 3rd vaccination, the median Ab level in both groups was 7000 AU/ml. Summary/Conclusion: The results of the current study show that at least 85% of HL pts develop a high titer of anti-spike antibodies after vaccination with 2 BNT162b2 doses. These titers substantially increased post the 3rd vaccine dose. Only a minority of HL pts who had additional background diseases or were heavily pretreated, failed to develop an adequate serological response;however, some of them had high Ab titers post-3rd and 4th vaccinations. In this study, morbidity and mortality rates of HL pts infected with COVID-19 were lower than those reported in pts with other lymphoma types.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies have a high risk of dying from COVID19 due to inability to mount humoral and cellular immune responses to the virus. Remdesvir is an inhibitor of viral RNA-polimerase. Some, but not all studies suggest it hastens recovery and reduces mortality in patients with COVID19. In a large randomized trial, convalescent plasma obtained from persons recovering from the infection was not proven to be useful in treatment of COVID19 in the general population, but other studies suggest it is useful in hematologic patients unable to produce antibodies against the virus. Recommendations on the use of these two drugs vary, some recommend its use only in severely immunocompromized individuals, some only in serious cases and some not at all. Reflecting these differences, the practice of using them varied between Croatian centers during the current pandemic. Aims: To analyze the effect of remdesvir and convalescent plasma on mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies by performing a matched-pair analysis. Methods: KroHem, the Croatian Cooperative Group for Hematologic Diseases, collected data on the outcome of patients with hematologic malignancies who became infected with SARS-COV2 while on concurrent systemic antineoplastic therapy during 2020 and 2021, before the appearance of the omicron strain. Patients treated with remdesvir and/or convalescent plasma were matched to those untreated according to age, disease type and antineoplastic therapy, factors found in our previous analyses to be related to outcome. Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and myeloproliferative neoplasms were excluded, due to low risk of COVID19 mortality. Death during infection was considered as due to COVID19. Results: We identified 119 patients fulfilling the entry criteria. Three could not be matched, 2 with T-PLL treated with alemtuzumab and one with plasmablastic lymphoma and newly diagnosed HIV infection. All three died. In the remaining 116 patient pairs remdesvir significantly reduced the mortality: 36 out of 106 treated patients died, in comparison to 54 untreated (p=0.0207, McNemar's test). The effect of plasma was not significant: 26 of 73 treated patients died, in comparison to 33 untreated (p=0.2812). Therapy was substantially more effective in patients who received treatment within a week from symptom onset;11 of 58 patients treated with remdesvir died in comparison to 33 untreated (p<0.0001) and 8 out of 35 treated with plasma in comparison to 20 untreated (p=0.0095). Patients treated with remdesvir only had similar outcomes as those treated with remdesvir and plasma (15% vs. 19% respectively). (Figure Presented ) Summary/Conclusion: Our study suggests that patients with hematologic neoplasia, who are at a high risk of dying from COVID19, should receive treatment with remdesvir and convalescent plasma as soon as possible, resulting in a 2.5-3 times reduction in mortality. The effect of later treatment, if any, is less prominent.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To investigate the risk factors for a blood infection in patients with lymphoma in order to guide the clinical prevention and control Of infection. Method: Clinical data were collected from 434 patients with lymphoma in 2019. including 231 males and 203 females. Blood samples were collected for culture, and the pathogens were identified by a VITEK-32 automated microbial identification system. PCR was used to detect Virulence genes of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Data were collected, such as patients' age, disease status, clinical stage, and pathological type. and risk factors affecting the incidence of infection in patients were analyzed using a Chi-square test.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients (pts) with cancer are at increased risk of severe COVID-19. Both underlying malignancy and anti-cancer treatments influence the immune system, potentially impacting the level of vaccine protection achieved. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and conference proceedings (ASCO annual meetings and ESMO congress) up to 28/09/21, was conducted to identify studies reporting anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoglobulin G seroconversion rates (SR) at any time point after complete COVID-19 immunization (mRNA- or adenoviral-based vaccines) in cancer pts. Complete immunization was defined as 1 dose of JNJ-78436735 vaccine or 2 doses of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the impact of cancer diagnosis, disease stage, and anticancer therapies on the SR. Overall effects were pooled using random-effects models and reported as pooled SR with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Of 1,548 identified records, 64 studies were included in this analysis reporting data from 10,511 subjects. The Table shows the SR in the overall population and specific subgroups. In pts with solid malignancies (SM), disease stage and primary site did not significantly impact the SR. In pts with hematologic malignancies (HM), SR were significantly lower in pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) compared to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Concerning the impact of cancer therapies on SR, pts with SM undergoing chemotherapy had numerically lower SR (N = 1,234, SR 87%, CI 81-92) compared to those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (N = 574, SR 94%, CI 88-97) or endocrine therapy (N = 326, SR 94%, CI 86-97) with or without another targeted therapy. Pts with HM treated with anti-CD20 therapy (within the last 12 months: N = 360, SR 7%, CI 2-20;or more than 12m: N = 175, SR 59%, CI 35-80), immune-modulating agents (BTK or BCL2 inhibitors) (N = 462, SR 47%, CI 32-64%) or other immunotherapies (anti-CD19/CART or anti-CD38) (N = 293, SR 37%, CI 23-53) had lower SR compared to pts treated with autologous (N = 353, SR 77%, CI 67- 85) or allogenic stem cell transplantation (N = 509, SR 77%, CI 68-84). Conclusions: SR varies between cancer types and anticancer therapies with some cancer pts having low protection against COVID- 19 even after complete vaccination.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may be at an increased risk from COVID-19- related complications due to immunosuppression and common therapies with pulmonary toxicities (e.g. bleomycin, radiation). Additionally, they may experience unexpected adverse events (AEs) from the novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines due to the intrinsic abnormalities in cellular immunity. Exploring their perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic and subjective AEs from the novel vaccines may ultimately allow providers to develop improved services based on needs of this specific population. Methods: We conducted a single-institution, questionnaire-based study in pts treated after 1/1/2015, for diagnosis of HL. Pts were identified through the electronic medical records at our institution. After signing an informed consent, pts answered 19 questions designed to reflect on their COVID-19 pandemic experience. An additional section aimed to determine the percentage of pts with a local or systemic AEs within 7 days of novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose. Results: We enrolled 30 pts with median age 28.5 years (18-66);16 (53%) were male, and 26 (87%) were on active HL therapy. With data cutoff 1/28/ 2022, 27 pts (90%) completed the questionnaire. A total of 8 (27%) patients had COVID-19 infection with 75% of those occurring after the vaccination. None required hospitalization and none reported residual pulmonary issues. Eighteen (67%) had a member of their household test positive for COVID-19. Most pts (67%) did not require cancellation of their appointments due to COVID-19-related issues during the pandemic. 85% of pts participated in at least 1 telehealth medical appointment and the majority (72%) were satisfied with their telehealth experience for cancer care. A total of 24 (80%) pts received the novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (58% had Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2, 38% Moderna mRNA-1273, 4% Ad26.COV2.S) and 23 pts completed the AE section of the questionnaire. The vaccines were generally well-tolerated. Six pts (26%) reported at least one grade 3 AE, but none had grade 4 local or systemic AEs. The most common AE was pain at injection site (65% after dose 1, 55% after dose 2, 69% after dose 3). AEs that occurred in over 25% of pts during any of the injections included redness/swelling/pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, and fever. Of 23 eligible pts, 13 (57%) received 3rd dose of the vaccine. No unexpected toxicities or autoimmune issues were noted by participants in this study following vaccination with a median follow up of 10 months after the 1st vaccine dose. Conclusions: Based on responses from our study, HL pts adjusted to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic with minimal disruptions to their cancer care, showed positive attitudes toward telehealth, and appear without any unexpected toxicities from the novel vaccines.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To conduct the first international cohort study to ascertain the short-term outcome for pediatric oncology patients who underwent treatment across 16 high-income countries (HICs) and 23 low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypotheses being tested was that the COVID-19 pandemic had affected paediatric cancer care, and that the outcomes of children were worse in LMICs. Design: A multicenter, international, collaborative cohort study. Setting: 91 hospitals and cancer centers in 39 countries providing cancer treatment to pediatric patients between March and December 2020. Participants: Patients were included if they were under the age of 18 years, and newly diagnosed with or undergoing active cancer treatment for Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, Wilms Tumor, Sarcoma, Retinoblastoma, Gliomas, Medulloblastomas or Neuroblastomas, in keeping with the World Health Organization Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Main outcome measure: All-cause mortality at 30 days and 90 days Results: 1660 patients were recruited. Over 30 days, 45 LMIC patients (4.3%;95% CI: 3.1 to 5.5) and 2 HIC patients (0.4%;95% CI: -0.1 to 0.9) died. 219 children had their treatments delayed, interrupted, or modified. LMIC patients had 11.7 (95% CI: 10.3 to 13.1) and 7.4 (95% CI: 6.5 to 8.3) times the risk of death at 30 days and 90 days respectively (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, pediatric cancer patients in LMICs had 35.7 times the odds of death at 30 days (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected pediatric oncology service provision. It has disproportionately affected patients in LMICs, highlighting and compounding existing disparities in healthcare systems globally that need addressing urgently. However, most pediatric cancer patients continued to receive their normal standard of care. This speaks to the adaptability and resilience of health-care systems and healthcare workers globally.
ABSTRACT
Background: Lymphoma is one of the most common primary malignancies of the hematopoietic system. Lymphoid neoplasms are classified into Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma accounts for about 5% of all cases of malignancies, It is less predictable than Hodgkin lymphoma and more liable for extra-nodal spread. Males are slightly more affected than females with higher incidence in white population. B-cell lymphomas have higher incidence in adults while T-cell lymphomas have higher incidence in children. With many imaging modalities that can describe the morphological changes in lymph nodes, it’s almost exclusive for the PET/CT to describe the biological changes in those lymph nodes through their uptake of FDG which has a great value in determining whether those lymph nodes are affected or not, which in turn will play an important role in treatment & management plan. What gives PET/CT scan the upper hand is that it acts on the biological level of the cells which permit early discovering of the affected lymph nodes, much earlier than standard C.T or MRI scan.